If you received a Stryker hip implant and have since experienced pain, implant failure, or required revision surgery, you may have grounds for a legal claim. Selecting the right Stryker hip lawsuit attorney is one of the most consequential decisions you will make in this process. The attorney you choose will directly affect the strength of your case, the speed of resolution, and the compensation you ultimately receive.
In 2012, Stryker Orthopaedics voluntarily recalled two modular hip implant systems — the Rejuvenate and ABG II — after reports of fretting and corrosion at the metal-on-metal junction. This corrosion releases chromium and cobalt ions into surrounding tissue, a condition known as metallosis. Patients suffered soft tissue damage, bone loss, implant loosening, and in many cases required painful and complex hip revision surgery. Thousands of lawsuits followed, and Stryker reached a settlement agreement in 2014 worth approximately $1.43 billion covering over 4,000 claimants. Additional claims have continued in subsequent years, making experienced legal representation essential for anyone still pursuing a claim.
Not every personal injury attorney is equipped to handle a hip replacement lawsuit. These cases involve complex medical evidence, biomechanical engineering testimony, FDA regulatory records, and an understanding of how multidistrict litigation (MDL) works. An attorney who specializes in defective medical devices — and specifically in orthopedic implants — will have established relationships with medical experts, access to prior discovery from Stryker cases, and a working knowledge of how Stryker's legal team operates.
When evaluating candidates, confirm they have handled Stryker Rejuvenate or similar metal-on-metal hip cases specifically. Ask how many cases they have resolved and whether any involved trial verdicts, not just settlements.
Most reputable Stryker hip lawsuit attorneys offer free initial consultations. Use this time strategically. Consider asking:
A confident, transparent attorney will answer these questions directly. Be cautious of any firm that guarantees a specific settlement amount or pressures you to sign immediately.
Nearly all Stryker hip lawsuit attorneys work on a contingency fee basis. This means you pay nothing upfront and owe no legal fees unless your attorney recovers compensation for you. Standard contingency fees in defective device cases range from 33% to 40% of the final settlement or verdict, though this can vary based on case complexity and whether the matter proceeds to trial.
Always request a written fee agreement that clearly outlines the percentage charged, how litigation costs are handled, and what happens if the case is unsuccessful. Some firms advance case expenses — such as expert witness fees and medical record retrieval — and deduct them from the settlement, while others bill separately. Clarifying this upfront avoids surprises later.
The surge in Stryker litigation has attracted firms with limited experience in this specific area. Watch for attorneys who cannot name the specific implant models involved in the recall, who outsource cases to other firms without disclosure, or who are unable to explain how chromium-cobalt ion toxicity affects your legal damages. Also be wary of law firms that rely entirely on television advertising without a verifiable track record in product liability cases.
Check attorney profiles through your state bar association, review platforms like Martindale-Hubbell or Avvo, and look for peer recognition in categories such as mass torts or medical device litigation.
Your Stryker hip lawsuit attorney will need specific records to evaluate your claim. Before your consultation, gather your surgical records indicating the implant model and lot number, post-operative imaging such as X-rays or MRI results, blood test results showing elevated chromium or cobalt levels, records related to any revision surgery, and documentation of lost income or out-of-pocket medical expenses. The more complete your records, the faster an attorney can assess your eligibility and build a compelling case on your behalf.
Pursuing a hip replacement lawsuit is a serious undertaking, but for patients who suffered needlessly due to a defective implant, it is also a legitimate path to accountability and financial recovery. The right legal representation makes that path significantly more navigable. Take time to vet multiple attorneys, ask hard questions, and choose someone whose experience, communication style, and resources align with the demands of your specific situation.
Millions of products with fast shipping — find what you need today.
Disclosure: Some links on this page are affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you make a purchase through these links, at no additional cost to you.
Handpicked resources from across the web that complement this site.